Bo Kyaw Nyein
Mizzima News (www.mizzima.com)
March 23, 2004
Irrawaddy, one of the most respected Burmese media organizations wrote in their editorial on August 2000 edition about the lack of motivation and frustration among Burmese activists and dissidents in exile and specifically criticized the NCGUB, National Coalition Government for Union of Burma, for lack of leadership and direction, under the title: Time for Soul Searching. It ended with the following statement:
Before it can hope to beat the junta or persuade the stubborn generals to come to the negotiating table, the opposition in exile needs to do some serious soul-searching. It is time for Burmese dissidents to shed the weight of ineffective policies and infuse the movement with new ideas if they wish to carry the ideals so many have died for into the next century.
NCGUB made a long official response ending with the following statement:
NCGUB should be judged on its political policies and its achievements according to its own objectives and not according to unrealistic expectations. The wide acceptance by the world community of the legitimate right of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD to govern Burma, the recognition that the ethnic peoples of Burma have a role in
determining the future of Burma, the pariah status of the military regime, and the continued strong international support for the whole democracy movement are the NCGUB’s achievements. By all means, let us debate and try to improve our performance but let us do so based on facts and in order to benefit the movement.
NCGUB is organizing a meeting on March 26th to discuss Burma issues. In
the spirit of improving the performance of the movement, shouldn’t we have a second round of soul searching and open debate?
No one can deny the fact that it was a correct political move to form a parallel government in exile, because Burmese generals refused to acknowledge the outcome of the 1990 election. It opened the legitimacy issue on who represented the Burmese people and most importantly, it gave these peoples’ representatives a “political space” to gather strength for more support for the NLD and galvanize all the opposition forces to free the people from the military rule.
From the start, the NCGUB and its leadership got stuck with the legitimacy issue and never realized what an opportunity they had in owning the ‘political space’ as legitimate representatives of the people and the power they had to organize the opposition and form a united movement to support NLD leadership and execute their strategic directions.
They made a strategic error to form an ‘Exclusive’ movement rather than
When the world and the leaders from the Western Democracies started to notice Daw Aung San Su Kyi’s (DASSK) courage and approved their support with granting her the Noble Peace Prize, the NCGUB was riding high by just riding her coattails. Instead of transforming this political capital towards building the political force, and at the same time highlighting the legitimacy issue, the NCGUB and its leadership fell into the trap of “Self Importance” and created a gated community for them, without knowing that they were becoming the Project-based politicians.
This article tries to cover two parts in an attempt to analyze the progress of the NCGUB:
This article is meant for Open Debate, history and specific single audience who can change the course of Burma history.
Because of the total control over the society by the military and their systematic oppression against the population, especially against the opposition, there was basically no “political space” for political opponents. When the elections were held in 1990, it was not a surprise that there was only a small pool to choose from for representation, and in many instances, the norm became whom you know and whom you can trust rather than the capacity or capability.
Right at their inception, some analysts suspected that the NCGUB didn't have any other strategic goals other than to fight for the legitimate right to represent Burma at the United Nations. As Daw Suu’s opposition against the military rulers showed more courage, and the world noticed her and as her support grew stronger among the Western democracies, the NCGUB started to get noticed and received more help from her admirers and supporters. As International support grew wider and stronger, as a de facto representative of DASSK and the NLD, the NCGUB tried to act as a gatekeeper to all the projects that bear the name of “Burma”. Although they claimed to be the opposite, there were ample incidents where the NCGUB tried to block projects that were awarded to organizations and individuals (both Burmese and non-Burmese) that were out of sphere of their influence. In one instance, the ongoing project that was supporting the students inside the country was cancelled per the request of the NCGUB. In the process, the NCGUB did not recognize that the more help Burmese organizations received from the International
donor community, the more good could be done for the people. After all, these are the people opposing the military rule and working for the same goal. In addition, we should not forget that there are many democratic liberators from all over the world seeking help from the same pool of International donors and any dollar lost for Burma’s cause will go to other countries causes.
During the past 13 years plus existence, while fighting for the legitimacy and acting as pretenders to the throne, some members of the NCGUB, if not all, came to think and feel as government ‘ministers’, instead of members of the exile government. All the projects that they had taken and produced were for ‘Transition Period’, and how to conduct good governance aligned to Western thinking and practices. Not a single document that described how to achieve the final goal for change in government formation could be found. This begs the question: Does the NCGUB expect Daw Suu and the NLD to present the government on a platter? Or do they believe that it is the sole responsibility of the NLD and its leadership to deliver the goal of the people: to change from military dictatorship to democracy. In the end, the NCGUB has become a ‘Bureaucratic Entity’, preparing and waiting for the transitional period Until last year, the NCGUB had ignored the Burmese opposition community and basically treated their partner NCUB as a distant cousin. Only when it became clear that they were losing credibility and support among the International donor community, they tried to reinvent themselves as ‘Grassroots Political Entity’, seeking help from the Burmese community and working much closely with the NCUB.
Sanctions against the ruling military government, known as State Peace And Development Council (SPDC), is one of the main pillars of the NLD strategy to weaken the SPDC and to bring them to the negotiation table. Yet from the start, the NCGUB’s involvement in persuading the Western Democratic Governments to set up Sanction regimes was very weak. The NCGUB did not recognize they needed to build Western grass-root support systems to pressure their respective governments. Because of this gap,
Free Burma Coalition, FBC, came into existence and it caught fire with the Pepsi campaign. If the NCGUB had been politically astute, or if they had known “Politics 101”, they would’ve understood that politics is the art to mobilize the masses, and the FBC would never have had a chance to fill in this huge political hole.
In addition to setting up grass-root campaigns and lobbying efforts to promote SANCTION REGIMES against the SPDC in the Western Democracies, what are missing are the Integrated Strategic directives for SANCTIONS. If there was a body that was responsible to set strategies, analyze the effects of these sanction regimes and act as an integrated HQ and clearinghouse for sanctions, appropriate steps could be taken to fill all the weaker links. Instead, there are several players running their own sanctions campaigns with their own agendas and there are several holes. Because of the UK Campaign, the UK had a very strong position against the SPDC, but Germany and France had a very weak view towards the sanctions. In addition, NCGUB's presence is a very weak one in the EU after their separation from the “advisor”.
Apart from the occasional meetings between local communist officials and NCUB leaders, the communication between the Chinese government and the opposition forces are pretty much non-existent. The same goes for the relationship with ASEAN countries. There were few meetings between low-to-mid-level officials from ASEAN and some people from the Foreign Relations Committee of the NCUB (NLD-LA).
Although NCGUB participates in the NCUB in the capacity of the MPU, and the NCGUB’s Prime Minister also holds the position as a member of the Presidium of the NCUB, one long time activist complained that the actual participation of the NCGUB in the NCUB has been pretty passive for the last 12 years.
It is pretty obvious that no one is looking at the big picture and no one knows how to connect the dots.
There is a committee called the Technical Advisory Network that was formed with several highly capable Burmese intellects. TAN is lead by the Director of Burma Fund. They have compiled some impressive documents, but again, its focus is on “Transition Period”. Instead, in the opinion of some Burmese intellects, it should look into the effects
of SANCTIONS on the SPDC and should be compiling position papers for NLD leadership or policy papers for NCGUB leadership, so they can advise the U.S. or any other policy makers of friendly Western Democracies, in the model of established Think Tanks.
After years of Sanctions, the SPDC today is in a much stronger position than before because their strategists have found a way to by-pass Western Sanctions regimes by strengthening regional trades with neighboring countries. In addition to ASEAN and China, the SPDC has successfully courted the South Asian countries for better relations and Burma is fast becoming the bridge between ASEAN and South Asian trading partners. SPDC even found a way to avoid US sanctions on financial transactions by successfully plotting for two Burmese banks to join the EU SWIFT network that includes Citibank and other major US banks.
To use an American football analogy, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is like a Quarterback who is working in a very tight space in a very short time before the opposite team tackles her. Even though she has thrown the ball in the right direction, to the right spot, it is the duty of the receivers to catch the ball. Instead, our receivers are repeatedly not running to catch the ball. This begs the question: Why are you still in the game?
Another critical leg of opposition strategy is THE UNITED NATIONS, where the NCGUB is supposed to show its presence as the legitimate representatives of the people of Burma. The NCGUB had invested a large amount of its resources in this institution where it placed a permanent representative in New York. After years of close door meetings and behind the scene maneuvers, there is not a tangible success to prove. No one expects NCGUB to replace SPDC for Burma’s seat at the United Nations; it is just a symbolic attempt to fight for the rightful representation. After years of presence and hard work, NCGUB should have systematically built a network of supporters and sympathizers to promote NLD leadership requests that fit into the overall strategy for the Opposition.
One of the options that many Burmese experts had suggested was to find sponsors to take Burma’s case to the UN Security Council. Everyone knows that the UN General Assembly has always been a debating society where nothing gets done. The UN General Assembly had been debating the Burma issue to death and after more than a decade no tangible and significant solution had been achieved.
Making the rounds, presenting one’s issue and lobbying to the permanent members and gathering support for the UN Security Council to take the case is a very complicated and complex task. NCGUB representatives must have enough finesse and must have enough experience to artfully articulate its position and views and debate in a smooth diplomatic
language. Because it is one of the most important world bodies, many countries usually send their best, brightest and most experienced diplomats to the United Nations.
There are many capable Burmese intellects that would fit well in this position. If the NCGUB had enough foresight to pick an established intellect like Dr Kyaw Win who knows the Western culture, complex relationships and politics among nations and who can very well articulate in diplomatic fashion, set goals and strategies, much desirable results would have been achieved. But instead, following the gated-community culture, NCGUB leadership chose an inexperienced ex-student leader to represent them. During Ne Win era, there was a famous phenomenon: Between a good person and able person, Ne Win always favors a “good” person for loyalty. Ne Win might be gone but his influence and thinking still dominates many Burmese.
Lobbying friendly governments to impose required SANCTIONS against the SPDC is another critical leg in the SANCTION strategy of the NLD and its leadership. Again, the NCGUB contribution is minimal and ineffective at best. Lobbying United States Congress is very expensive. It cost the SPDC nearly half a million dollars to attain a lobbying firm to represent them for anti-SANCTION measures. Basically, Burmese opposition was able to obtain an enormous result with minimal cost because US
political leadership had a great respect and admiration for Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. Open Society Institute plays a much more significant role for SANCTIONS than the NCGUB.
It is not an assumption, but it has been clear to many players who are involved or have interest in Burmese politics of the shortfalls of the NCGUB. It is only fair to examine why they fail repeatedly:
The following factors should be considered:
Poor Leadership skills
Poor Management skills
Lack of Critical thinking
Lack of Creative thinking
Poor Strategic thinking
In dealing and communication with NCGUB leadership, it becomes very obvious that none of them exert a strong leadership and none possess management skills. Even in American Presidential elections, when campaigns are led by weak managers they become directionless and political infighting overtook the effectiveness. Democratic Presidential
candidate John Kerry firing his campaign manager and replacing with seasoned political operative is accredited to Kerry’s success in the current Democratic Presidential Nominee process and is a good example.
In addition, most of the people in the leadership position of the NCGUB have neither creative nor critical thinking skills. What is especially lacking is the “strategic thinking skills”. The job of every leadership is to show “Vision”, create opportunities, motivate the supporters and show the road that can lead to success. During their 14 years of
existence, there is not a single document or speech that shows the vision, position, thinking or strategic game plan to reach the final goal.
Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB) was created with the help of Norwegian Burma Council and should be the pride of the NCGUB. If they had known how to manage it properly, it could’ve been a very effective tool, not only to educate the population inside Burma with news and articles, but also to become a beacon to guide the population with strategic direction to support Daw Suu and the NLD and how to conduct non-violence civil disobedience acts. During the 1988 uprising, BBC played a critical role in inciting population inside Burma. Rebellious Iranian TV from Los Angeles was instructing Iranian people where to gather during people demonstrations against the mullahs. In order to raise its level to become a true beacon of freedom, DVB needs strong leadership and management direction from the NCGUB. Instead DVB niche became the latest
news and their interviews and articles still lacked present critical political thinking and strategic initiatives. Worse, a few years back during their annual meeting DVB people demanded “independence” because they now feel they are “journalists” who must prove their independence. Do they want to become Burma FOX NEWS network: fair and balance? This is another showcase of poor management and leadership by the NCGUB team.
No matter what positions and titles they took in the past, many if not all of NCGUB members are nothing but faceless bureaucrats who can only shout long live Daw Suu and please support Daw Suu. They are indeed “ineffective political Zombies”
The worst crime of the NCGUB is that they think they can deliver the success with a few dozen ministers who have the right to carry the NLD banner. Leaving no space for others, especially the “Student activists”. They have no clue that politics is motivating people and creating strength through “participatory politics”, and everyone deserves a role to play.
Several political analysts who took an interest in Burma like to compare Burma to South Africa, because of the two moral giants of 20th century: Nelson Mandela and Daw Suu. If we have to be honest to ourselves, that is the only similarity we have between Burma and South Africa. But, we don’t have to be If one studies the history of the ANC movement, there were several heroes who had sacrificed for the success of the “CAUSE”, before Mandela came into the scene. Since it was formed in 1912, as the South African Native National Congress and later changed its name to the African National Congress in 1923, the ANC, was an established Political Engine filled with seasoned and battle-hardened political operatives. They had
regional and division leaders and there were several wings within the organization, which made ANC as a whole. There were Communists, Nationalists and common citizens who wanted to be free from Apartheid. Most importantly they had a “structured command”.
Also, there were several leaders that Nelson Mandela could rely upon, both inside and outside Africa. An example was, Oliver Tambo. He was a valuable leader who ran the ANC external operations and mobilized the international opinion support. In a simple sense, O. R. as he was known, was a political animal not a bureaucratic zombie.
What we are missing is an Oliver Tambo of Burma.
If NCGUB leadership had been seasoned political operatives, following initiatives could be taken to support the NLD leadership and complementing the struggle in the battle with SPDC right off the gate: (14 years too late)
Mobilizing the Opposition Force
Setting goals and direction
Creating an experience team for United Nations
Creating an experience team for International Relationship
Creating a Think Tank to tackle Strategic Issues
Creating a Business Team to build Burmese owned companies
Creating a Humanitarian team to handle Humanitarian issues
Creating a SANCTIONS committee
Creating a Human Resource Committee
Creating a Media team
Creating UG movement team
When the NCGUB was formed, everyone was full of HOPE. Enthusiasm filled
the air. They were the elected representatives of the people headed by trusted
cousin of Daw Suu. Everyone was waiting to be led.
In this environment, the first thing the NCGUB should’ve done was to hold a meeting in Bangkok, Thailand, in the name of unity, and they could’ve formed an organization in some form of United Front. Let everyone join. Let every one participate.
If they were politically astute they could easily build two institutions:
Parallel Government in Exile
United Political Force
If they were experienced political operatives like Oliver Tambo of ANC, they could build the strength and force through UNITY, and once the momentum gains traction, they can use this momentum for further recruitment and grow the Opposition Forces.
They could form a separate alliance like the United Democratic Front (where Desmond Tu Tu became the well know leader and spokesperson) for groups that do not conform to the declared NLD policy of Non-Violence. Example groups are the ABSDF, and other Ethnic organizations that are pursuing the armed revolution. This would have two effects:
Deniability for NLD Leadership
Maintaining the Bond and relationship with other opposition groups
Other Critical Effects
Failing to execute integrated policies and strategies for SANCTIONS, UNITED NATIONS and INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT are unforgivable failures of
the NCGUB. If they have enough foresight and understanding of International
relationships, opposition would not be in a big hole facing sanctions. Present Sanctions regimes could not deliver the desired results and have weakened the NLD's leadership position in facing the SPDC because the opposition could not muster other neighboring countries, for example, Japan and the EU to fully support US led sanction policies. One of the major factors was that there were not enough effective efforts to build relationships with the above-mentioned Nations by the opposition.
Human Resource Failure
One of the major dangers facing Burma as a country is Human Resource failure. Because of a poor education system during Ne Win rule and the purposely-neglected Education system under the SPDC rule, Burma’s educated population is dwindling at a fast pace. At the border camps and even among the refugees who had moved to the Western democracies, there could and should be Burmese led NGOs to educate them or give them assistance programs to proceed with their education. How many of the students and refugees who came to the Western democracies could uplift themselves and join the white-collar world? If there was an arm of the opposition led by the Burmese to open schools and education centers in the border areas, and if they took care of these issues, this would be such help for Burma. This is where many of the International donors had
a soft heart and yet no one in the NCGUB leadership could think to help the Burmese exile population. There are several benefits to the types of programs where Burmese with better education and experience will be able to contribute for the future. It will be such an effective organization tool to attract and organize many activists under one roof.
One of the main problems facing Burma at present time is not only oppression. Poverty, HIV-AIDS and healthcare are totally neglected by the ruling SPDC regime. Some of the SANCTIONS provisions do affect the struggling poor. Many International Organizations and United Nations wanted to help more, but because of the opposition they face from the
pressure groups they could not. And the only way to reach these suffering people is through SPDC. It is a catch 22. After more than 15 years, the situation begs a question: Who is looking out for the poor and neglected?
To highlight the neglect of SPDC and to help the Burmese poor, there may be a solution.
If the NCGUB leadership can obtain permission from the leader, a non-political foundation should be formed in the name of our leader General Aung San to help the poor. Let’s say for instance, “AUNG SAN FOUNDATION FOR POOR”. If Daw Suu will permit this idea and contribute a small amount for a startup fee, and she and she alone should select any credible and trusted Burmese citizens with experience to lead this
organization and announce this to be a totally “apolitical” organization with the simple goal to help the poor.
This foundation would build and run schools, build medical clinics for the poor and take care of HIV-AIDS patients, as well as educating people in how to stop spreading this terrible disease. It can even organize “Community Banking” where selecting community leaders and lending money to the community rather than individuals and teaching the poor personal financial responsibilities. Most importantly to provide them with the source of lending. This is getting popular and gaining traction in some developing countries and it can replace the “Chitties of Burma’.
One can argue that the SPDC will never let it happen since they will never let go of their tight “control”. If that is the case, then Burmese opposition can gather international pressure and it will create a venue for everyone to start a pressure campaign. This is not politics, but a genuine humanitarian program to help the suffering poor.
If the SPDC does not block this, it will give the International community and donors the go-ahead to help the real people who are suffering. It will also provide an opportunity for the population to learn more from the Western world about the value of democracy.
This is how HAMAS built their network and how they won the hearts of the people when PLO became inefficient and corrupted.
NCGUB Long Road towards Irrelevancy
NCGUB is like a six year old who inherited a Ferrari.
Daw Suu is a “Moral Giant” in today’s global scene. Through her strong beliefs, courage, determination and steadfast opposition against the military dictatorship, she has rightfully gained her place as one of the 20th century’s moral leaders, among Nelson Mandela, Dalai Lama, Jimmy Carter to name a few.
Giving a chance to hold the banner of the leader is not only an honor, it is also a ‘power’. If only the NCGUB and its leaders had learned the basics of politics, the Burmese opposition status might be very different. After 14 years of wasting time on projects that are fundamentally preparing to take control of the government after the fall of the military government, the credibility of the NCGUB among Burmese communities and International communities is degrading fast towards irrelevancy. The assistance the NCGUB is receiving today from International donors, compared to the status of what Daw Suu received in the world is pretty pathetic and embarrassing. It is an embarrassment to Daw Suu and Burma that the National Endowment for Democracy has reduced its support significantly and the support from the EU is waning.
Voodoo Politics, Political Zombies and Aristide Democrats
Because of this lost support among international communities, the NCGUB is now trying to build the grass-root support among the Burmese community. They are trying to showcase Ft Wayne to sell as the biggest gathering of Burmese. What many did not know was that major players from Ft Wayne boycotted the meeting and nearly half of the attendees are Mon nationals from the area. There are now three supporting groups behind
the NCGUB: Half a dozen ex-students from Ft Wayne, about a dozen or two supporters from the New York area and some from Washington D.C. area.
For many of them, “democracy” means BSPP era democracy, where the essence is to get rid of anyone who proposes or presents ideas different from them. They are praying for the release of Daw Suu without any long-term or short term thinking on how to obtain Daw Suu’s release and for the change of the military regime. Demonstrations and giving
interviews are their favorite activities. They love to curse the SPDC and their followers on the Internet and in Burmese political forums, writing poems and praising each other. They have been behaving in this manner for the past 14 years without even realizing that they are moving in a circle and getting no where. They don’t know that without structured, organized, effective and integrated movement, the SPDC can always maintain the advantage. Naturally they have been coined as: Voodoo Politics and Political Zombies.
On February 26 2004, the VOA interviewed General Bo Mya, a long time leader of the Karens. Answering the question on the KNU relationship with other organizations. General Bo Mya mentioned that the NCGUB considered the KNU as rebels and themselves as government. In his response, the NCGUB minister lectured the VOA interviewer that there are certain questions that should not be asked and that General Bo Mya should let P.R. experts handle the media. They still do not understand the fact that in a democracy, even Presidents and Prime Ministers were not spared from difficult and embarrassing questions, especially from the hostile press. In today’s media environment there is no taboo subject and no one practices self-censorship anymore. And, of course there are Committee Dictators and Forum Dictators who can easily become street thugs like Aristide Democrats.
Time & Space
Just like in Astrophysics, ‘Time’ and ‘Space’ are important phenomena in Politics. Throughout their rule of 40 years, Burmese military men knew very well of political space and timing. Like they had done with every major opposition leader before her, military leaders created a very tight space for Daw Suu and NLD leadership. The military game plan is an open book. Taking advantage of the full control they have over the
population and knowing well the weakness of the opposition, they play the “game” to prolong their rule.
To be honest and truthful, Burma opposition is like a Hollywood set for Western movies. At the front, the set has all the salons and bars and the sheriff’s office: the view of the small town main street. But in the back of the set there is nothing. There is Daw Suu, up in the front, but at the back there is nothing. Even NLD could not build an effective
opposition because the SPDC did not allow any political space. Once they put Daw Suu under house arrest and detained NLD leaders and crushed the party activities, the opposition became close to non-existence. When the SPDC releases Daw Suu, once again they will allow her to rebuild the NLD, but only under a controlled environment. The SPDC had arrested all the political operatives they deem dangerous, and those who could advise Daw Suu on a permanent basis. Basically, SPDC has denied Daw Suu a “Political Space”.
SPDC is also playing the game of attrition with “time”. NLD Central Committee members are getting old and by blocking political space, there is only a very small pool of leaders to groom and replace.
The NCGUB and the leaders in exile have the Political space and time to create the force and if they were smart and politically astute, they could help to form the UG movement inside the country by grooming and training the next generation of leaders and recycle them back into the country to strengthen the movement. Instead of taking their own
initiatives, taking charge and showing their leadership, none of the NCGUB leaders have political courage to make any important decisions without instructions from the NLD leadership. It is fuzzy logic. It is almost impossible for any leader in detention and isolation to pass any instructions.
Burma Strategy Group
Free Burma Coalition was born because the NCGUB left a big political space, failing to form pressure groups for sanctions with grass-root support. Similarly there is a big gap at the present time to help find political space for NLD leadership. There is a strategy shift among the ASEAN countries where they could not ignore the problems of Burma. As
ASEAN countries became economically stronger and their importance on the global theater became more defined, they are learning that they have more say as a “Collective Voice”. In dealing with powerhouses such as the United States and the EU, Burma becomes a stumbling block. ASEAN is not a new kid anymore. ASEAN is growing fast and becoming an adolescent, and they have this gangster cousin (SPDC) in their midst. Also, Burma will take her turn as a chairmanship of ASEAN in 2006 and some analysts
feel strongly that ASEAN would like to avoid any embarrassment.
Some see this as an opportunity. SPDC will be pressured to find a solution. Some are worried that Daw Suu and the NLD will be sidelined by the SPDC and will find their own solution with other groups. Some decided that clear but delicate message should be sent to the SPDC and that no solution could be genuine and lasting without the participation of Daw Suu and the NLD, while not losing the opportunity to find a
solution for the country. At the same time Daw Suu should be confident that only she has the key to the solution and there are supporters who will understand when the leader has to make difficult and complex decisions.
Burma Strategy Group is a matrix group formed of many experienced and educated individuals of different personalities and backgrounds. Many had a long history of fighting the military dictatorship. The common denominator is that all want to find the “solution” that can end the suffering of the people. Many understand the value of Time and Space.
NCGUB’s response to Irrawaddy was: ‘not to expect unrealistic expectation.’ Its goals do not reach beyond its primary objective: to be the exile government to fight for legitimacy.
Even if this is the sole objective, within 14 years of existence, the NCGUB has failed miserably. Because the NCGUB is carrying the banner of the NLD leadership, NCGUB’s failure became Burma’s failure. Many have lost hopes and have become disillusioned. Many capable and able Burmese are losing interest in the fight because the NCGUB could not deliver direction or leadership and people are losing HOPE.
NCGUB has invited people for another meeting on Burma to be held on the 26th of March 2004. How many forums and how many panel discussions had we been through for all these 14 years without any tangible and desired results?
Daw Suu and NLD leadership is still in detention. Fifty millions people are still suffering. The brigade that could have saved the leaders and the country is charging towards an opposite direction. Sounds of the charging brigade are fading away. Will this be known as the 20th century ‘Charge of the Light Brigade’? Or will historians coin him as ‘Aristide of Burma’?
(The Author, Bo Kyaw Nyein, is a member of Burma Strategy Group. )